Why Your Rising AHT Isn't a Problem—It's a Warning Sign

I've sat in that conference room. You know the one. Where a senior leader pulls up a dashboard and asks why your team's Average Handle Time jumped 25% this quarter. And you're sitting there, knowing your agents are working harder than they ever have. You've just rolled out AI chatbots, customer satisfaction is climbing, and customers are happier than ever.

But the numbers don't lie, right?

Wrong. The numbers are a red herring . And as early adopters, we are starting to see it. 

The AI Paradox Nobody's Talking About

For decades, AHT was the gold standard. Lower AHT meant faster resolutions, better efficiency, happier customers. The math was simple: reduce time per ticket, improve team performance. These metrics worked when every ticket had roughly equal complexity.

Then AI changed everything.

In the past two years, AI adoption has transformed customer support. Chatbots now deflect over half of simple queries. AI assistants handle password resets, invoice requests, and basic how-to questions in seconds. Teams are seeing massive efficiency gains; on paper.

But here's the paradox: when you remove all the simple tickets from your queue, your average handling time doesn't show a decrease; it spikes.

Think about it. If AI deflects the 3-minute tickets and keeps the 45-minute ones, your "average" skyrockets. You're left with the consultative sessions, the multi-system integrations, the edge-case bugs, the complex scenarios that require actual human expertise. And suddenly, your high-performing team looks inefficient on every dashboard.

Over three-quarters of customer service reps report that their workload and the complexity of customer issues have increased compared to a year ago. Over half are experiencing burnout. Agent attrition has become a major challenge for support organizations.

It's not that agents got worse. It's that the job fundamentally changed. Though our metrics didn't.

What Your Complex Tickets Are Really Telling You

Those complex tickets that are "ruining" your AHT? They're not just hard problems. They're early warning signals for churn.

As I have deployed AI recently, I've learned something critical: complexity isn't a support problem. It's a product problem.

• Every ticket that requires five steps instead of two is telling you something. 

• Every escalation that touches four different systems instead of one is a signal. 

• Every workaround your agents create because the actual solution doesn't exist? That's your product showing you exactly where customers are going to leave.

Research backs this up. Customers who encounter product friction in their first 72 hours of usage are significantly more likely to churn. Users experiencing onboarding friction are three times more likely to cancel. And support ticket sentiment shifts days before customers actually make the decision to leave. Your support team is already spotting these signals. They just don't have a framework to quantify it or communicate it cross-functionally.

Enter Resolution Complexity: A Framework, Not Just a Metric

Support teams are already measuring complexity, through escalation rates, agent touches, ticket reopens, and routing thresholds. AI vendors are using complexity ratings internally to decide what gets automated and what gets escalated to humans.

But we don't have a unified framework. We're not connecting it to churn. We're not using it to drive product roadmaps.

That's what Resolution Complexity does. It takes the metrics you're already tracking and transforms them into strategic intelligence that prevents churn.

Resolution Complexity is a framework that consolidates the complexity indicators you're already measuring; 

• escalation rates

• agent touches

• ticket reopens

• resolution times

into a unified view that reveals product friction before it becomes churn.

You don't need new tracking systems. You need a new way to synthesize what you're already measuring.

The Cross-Functional Unlock

Here's what Resolution Complexity unlocks that traditional metrics can't:

• For Product Teams: Clear, data-driven roadmap prioritization based on revenue risk. Instead of guessing which bugs to fix, you know exactly which friction points are driving customers away. A single integration fix that drops complexity from 8 to 4 might prevent hundreds of escalations and retain entire customer segments.

• For Engineering: The multiplier effect becomes visible. Fix one API endpoint that's causing multi-system workarounds, and you eliminate the need for agents to become system integrators. Suddenly, technical debt has a dollar value tied to customer retention.

• For Executives: Early warning signals appear days before customers cancel. A spike in complexity for accounts above certain ARR thresholds? That's your portfolio risk dashboard. You have time to intervene with product improvements, not just save attempts.

• For Customer Success: Elevation from cost center to strategic partner. You're not just resolving tickets faster, you're identifying the product friction that predicts churn and communicating it in a language that Engineering and Product actually respond to.

This is the shift I've been driving throughout my career. From measuring activity to measuring impact. From optimizing for efficiency to eliminating friction. From reacting to problems to predicting and preventing them.

The Choice Ahead

You can keep optimizing for speed. Keep trying to bring that AHT down while AI continues to deflect simple tickets and leave you with increasingly complex ones. Keep watching your metrics tell you that you're getting slower while your team gets more burned out.

Or you can start measuring what actually matters: the complexity your customers face. The friction your product creates. The signals your support team is already seeing that predict churn.

The teams that figure this out early will have a massive competitive advantage. They'll reduce churn while competitors are still arguing about AHT targets. They'll build better products faster because they're listening to the right signals. They'll position Customer Success as strategic, not transactional.

If you're ready to transform your customer support metrics from a speed game to a strategic intelligence engine, let's talk. I help companies and CS leaders implement Resolution Complexity frameworks that connect support data to revenue outcomes.

Because the question isn't whether to measure complexity. Your team is already drowning in it. 

The question is: are you ready to turn that complexity into competitive advantage?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Susan Priti is the founder of The Moxie Lab, specializing in customer experience transformation and AI-driven support strategy. She has pioneered AI adoption in customer support, led global CX transformations, and won a Silver Stevie Award for transforming customer support into customer experience.